Some time ago, I pulled some material
from Alice Miller's The
Truth Will Set You Free to post on Overcoming Botkin Syndrome which speaks specifically to the problem of family dysfunction within
patriarchy. Today, Christmas Eve, I'd like to draw from my
blog post there to consider a stark contrast to Michael Pearl's
approach and to introduce some new material concerning him. I
strongly suggest that people who are interested in the subject of
Pearl read Miller's book For Your Own Good as well as the aforementioned work. You can read more excerpts as they
apply to patriocentricity HERE.
Miller wrote about
the “poisonous pedagogy” or the “black pedagogy” as it
translates from German, a term which describes oppressive practices
that people use when raising children. She defines this term as
“the
kind of parenting and education aimed at breaking a child’s will
and making that child into an obedient subject by means of overt or
cover coercion, manipulation, and emotional blackmail”
(from the preface). . .
This section
appears in The
Truth Will Set You Free in the epilogue entitled “From
Ignorance To Knowledge and Compassion.”
(In my edition, this section appears starting on page 190 and
concludes with a section appearing on page 195.) The book
speaks of “generational faithfulness” as old patterns of
dysfunction, of how parents unknowingly use their children to
medicate their old pains of the past. The whole chapter speaks
respectfully of the Bible, but it draws into question the traditions
of men (emphasis mine).
The
figure of Jesus confounds all those principles of poisonous
pedagogy… Long before his birth Jesus received the greatest
reverence, love and protection from his parents… His
earthly parents saw themselves as his servants… Would it
not make eminent sense to encourage believers to follow the example
of Mary and Joseph and regard their children as the children of God
(which in a sense they are)?
[T]he
members of the upcoming generations will have the courage to call
evil by its name…It is high time to relinquish the destructive
models and to mistrust the principle of obedience. [Please
read more about the culture of blind obedience versus the culture of
virtue HERE.] We have no need of docile children brainwashed by
their upbringing to be ideal
targets of seduction by terrorists and lunatic ideologists,
ready to fall in with their commands even to the extent of killing
others. Children given the respect they deserve from their
earliest years will go through life with open eyes and ears, prepared
to fight injustice, stupidity, and ignorance with arguments and
constructive action. Jesus did this at the age of twelve, and
the scene in the temple (Luke 2:41-52) demonstrates eloquently that,
if need be, he could refuse the obedience his parents asked of him
without hurting their feelings.
With
the best will in the world we cannot truly emulate the example of
Jesus. None of us were carried by our mothers as the child of
God; indeed, for far too many parents, children are merely a burden.
What we can do, provided we really want to, is learn from the
attitude displayed by Joseph and Mary. They did not demand
docility from their son, and they felt no urge to inflict
violence on him. Only if we fear the confrontation with our own
histories will we need to have power over others and cling to it with
all our might. And if we do that it is because we feel too weak
to be true to ourselves and our own feelings. But being honest
to our children will make us strong. In order to tell the
truth we do not need to have power over others. Power
is something we only need in order to spread lies and hypocrisy, to
mouth empty words and pretend they are true.
Now, on to the
stark contrast offered by Michael Pearl.
Please be
forewarned that the individual who introduces this specifically
edited material from Pearl has selected items that will portray him
in the worst possible light, and he uses a term of vulgarity in his
introduction of the video clips of Michael Pearl – clips that No
Greater Joy would rather you not see unless you are one of their true believers. Though not in complete
context and despite the offensive language in the introduction, I
believe that it demonstrates the callousness that Pearl brings to the
discussion. Pearl's material is offensive, so I don't know that it's
entirely out of place.
I encourage the
reader here to go directly
to YouTube to save a copy of this video, because Pearl has
already attempted to censor the material. In this clip, the
offensive language falls at 42 seconds into the video,
and the introduction concludes at time mark 1:17.
If the video doesn't automatically display, link to it HERE while it is still available.
If the video doesn't automatically display, link to it HERE while it is still available.
Regarding the
clip, The
Why Not Train a Child? website transcribes from the clip and poses these questions:
“If
he screams too hard with the first 5… gets hysterical… Wait…
You know, a little psychological terror sometime will affect even the
pain.” Said while waiving a switch over the rag doll’s behind. He
couldn’t possibly be advocating using psychological terror on your
child, could he?
“Thumping
them on the head? You’re worried about that??? [turns to wife] Give
me another question.” I’m trying to figure out how this quote was
used in a Biblical context and falling short. I’m sure that someone
will have an answer for me.
“If
your husband is an angry man, make love to him, make him happy.”
This seems to be the advice given to a wife who asks how to deal with
a husband who only disciplines in anger. It would seem that he is
saying that his anger is his wife’s fault because she is not giving
him enough sex. But I must be misunderstanding, because that does not
sound Biblical to me.
[switching
rag doll] “So I give them 5 more, so now get up” [makes doll sit,
it's showing a frown] “Still got a bad attitude” [whack whack
whack] “Get up” [checks again, still frowning] “I’m going to
say, ‘You’re still crying… I’m going to give you something to
cry about.” This sounds like he’s saying to keep on switching the
child until he stops crying. I’m sure he must say at some point
when to stop switching because they are making it look like this
could go on for a long time. And why would a man of God teach parents
that they should punish a child until he pretends to be happy? For
the child to force himself to smile and pretend to be happy means
that the child must pretend be something he is not, the very
definition of hypocrisy. Surely he is not advocating forcing a child
to sin! Our Lord, Jesus Christ, reserved His harshest condemnation
for hypocrites.
I
am trying very hard not to judge unfairly. This video comes from a
secular source and was clearly edited to cast Mr. Pearl in a negative
light. My purpose here is to provide arguments to counter his
teachings, not to slander him. This is clearly a hatchet job, I need
to know what his arguments really are in order to counter them. For
that reason I linked to the video (removed by NGJ by Copyright
Claim) so that someone can explain this to me.
The
source of this video offers other clips concerning Pearl's material,
and I've been hesitant to present them here because of the offensive
language. Today I offer them.
On
this day of celebration of the Advent of the Messiah, I challenge
people to consider that Joseph and Mary offer us a far better example
of how to raise a child with respect as opposed to trying to dominate
them into docility. How do we celebrate Jesus on days that are not
holidays? How do we live out the love and honor of our faith, and
how do we model that and teach that to our children? I'd much rather
look to Joseph and Mary, just as Alice Miller poses the challenge.
~~~~~
Concerning
the discussion of the Schatz Family on AC 360, The
Mudbrooker offers this critique. Note that the critic uses an
expletive at time mark 5:32 and 10:27.
Link directly to it HERE if it doesn't display automatically.
Link directly to it HERE if it doesn't display automatically.
Please file
this away and enjoy the spirit of the day, but I hope that you would
think about the parenting style of Joseph and Mary.
- A list of ALL POSTS related to Lydia Schatz, Michael Pearl, and Blind Obedience
- CNN's Reports about the deaths of Lydia Schatz and Hannah Williams, and interviews with Michael Pearl on AC360 and Dr. Drew.
-
Posts about Kidney Disease related to the Pearl Method