Just this week, I learned of resources
about the more optimistic side of how mores can work in positive and
beneficial ways. Reminded of what I already understood, I found the
balance of the new perspective of optimism quite refreshing. I even learned a new phrase to describe them: the
“hidden curriculum.” In the back of my head I thought,
“Why didn't I think of that term myself? It's so obvious!”
Unwritten Rules (the “Hidden
Curriculum”) in Cultic Groups: A Review
A few years ago, Voddie Baucham
contacted me, and his correspondence presented such an excellent
example of this dynamic in a system of spiritual abuse, I wrote a
blog post entitled Why
Doctrinal Statements Tell You Nothing of the Unwritten Rules of a
Manipulative Group. The concrete examples it contains are well
worth reading. The topic of family integrated churches illustrated
well the disparagement between what adherents tell you about the
topic, but they conveniently leave the unpleasant bits unspoken.
(Voddie has a reputation as a master of this type of avoidance and
equivocation.) The average person finds out about the hidden rules
when they are either disciplined, usually in an informal way, for
violating rules or when the restrictive nature of the abusive system
presses in on them. They are the informal, unwritten rules which are
often communicated indirectly through a host of propaganda techniques
and fallacies including but not at all limited to unstated
assumption, vagueness,
and problems identifying proper
cause. Often, no one ever directly states the rules plainly or
clearly which allows for plausible deniability, but reasonable people
definitely comprehend them. They develop an organic and covert
understanding of the rules, even if the are unable to identify their
specifics which is often why they are so powerful until someone else
wraps words around them. The story of the Emperor's
New Clothes offers a great example of the hidden curriculum
at work.
Johnson and VanVonderan's The
Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse refers to this manipulative
influence as a set of “deeply ingrained spiritual codes that
control and condemn” members. And here we find the difference
between social mores that provide for an orderly and polite society
that fosters respect for all individuals and groups which use their
own created social mores and spiritual codes to exploit and control
members within a social group. The authors note that such groups
conceal the unwritten rules from people during the “honeymoon
phase” of recruitment and involvement, because chances are that
if given true informed consent about the rules, most people would
politely decline participation.
While concealing the true nature of the
system's hidden curriculum in the early phase of group involvement,
those members begin to invest personally in the life of the group
through participation and social relationships. These connections to
the group build what Johnson and VanVonderan call “sweat
equity.” Just like abandoning the developed equity builds by
paying on a home mortgage would be difficult for the financially
responsible and prudent person, likewise, most people find it
difficult to abandon their personal investments in manipulative
groups, even after they learn the unpleasant specifics about the
hidden curriculum.
The Positive Role of Curriculum
While chatting with Rafael Martinez,
the director of Spiritwatch.org
about this phenomenon, he used the term “hidden curriculum” to
describe the abusive unwritten rules of cultic groups and also
referred to them as a group's “oral
traditions.” I tend to think of oral traditions as a separate
feature of a social, but I had the epiphany that the unwritten rules
of a cultic group are very much a part of them, too. The term “oral
traditions” connotes something quite positive for me, but the
dynamics of cultic manipulation in spiritually abusive groups twist
oral traditions into something quite negative.
Lawrence Richards |
Rafael referred me to the writings of
Lawrence
Richards on the topic, specifically to his writings on education
including Christian
Education: Seeking to Become Like Jesus Christ. (Consider
his related work as Sociology 101 for Christians, if you like. I
think that my short discussion about the book was more profitable
than my whole semester in my own intro class almost thirty years
ago!)
Richards talks about the power of the “hidden
curriculum” as the powerful teacher of situational content and
context which is learned not through didactics but through
socialization through living. We use the hidden curriculum to build
good habits of living, a very popular topic at this time of year as
people come up with their New Year's Resolutions. Richards teaches
that skill training and attitude building should be harnessed to
reinforce and solidify formal learning into a synthesis in a way that
benefits faith and well-being for people within a group or an
educational setting.
From Richards in Christian
Education:
It is in the design of the hidden curriculum that the heart of the educational ministry actually lies. And the primary emphasis of training in Christian education (in fact, in training for any ministry), ought to be the sensitizing of the educator to the hidden curriculum issues and elements, and to principles for their design. Theological considerations . . . the nature of the Christian faith, the nature of the Church, the process of growth toward transformation which discipleship involves . . . all these give us guidance enough to provide just this kind of training for the future leadership of the Church, and enough practical hints for significant change in our practices today. (pg 322)
For manipulative groups who harness the
powerful influence of the hidden curriculum so well, they must rise
to the challenge of abandonment of the misguided and flawed
principles and abusive means. By refocusing on the essentials of
the faith rather than the hobby horse doctrines that prove their
specialness before God (as
Henke explains through several of the dynamics of spiritual
abuse), aberrant Christian groups can create a positive “process of
growth toward [positive and healthy] transformation”
rather than fostering conformity through domination, control and an
exploitation of the hidden curriculum through deception.