Continuing on from the
previous post which discussed one of Robert Lifton's case studies
which illustrated the Doctrine
Over Person element of ideological manipulation, I've selected
some additional highlights from his book, Thought
Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. I believe that they
will help the reader gain a better understanding of how abuse,
psychological pressures, and social influence affect an unsuspecting
participant in any spiritually abusive group. Manipulative salesmen
and religious zealots use these very same pressures to exploit
unsuspecting and good natured people every day.
I once attended a church were many of
the elders talked about their testimonies, claiming to have come from
families of alcoholism. I was surprised to eventually learn that
many of the men who made these claims did not have parents who were
alcoholics, but they were emulating the more powerful leaders in the
group who did have this experience to gain favor with them. There
seemed to be an unspoken expectation in the group for leaders to make
these kinds of confessions as an expression of solidarity and
fraternalism, regardless of whether the details of their confessions
were true.
True
Woman(TM)
Conferences come to mind for me as well. Women are encouraged to
speak at microphones after the main services in the evening to
confess and “repent of feminism” which may amount to working as a
phone receptionist at a cab company where a woman confesses how she
directed male taxi drivers where to go to meet and pick up their new
fares. Such behavior was reconstructed and redefined by those women,
not as a dutiful performance of their job responsibility but as the
usurping of the authority of the male cab driver which somehow
qualified them as a feminist tantamount to Gloria Steinem or Jane
Fonda. In other complementarian groups, having any job outside the
home or having once gone to college is also cause to repent of being
a secular feminist.
Apart from the pressures and the
doctrine of these high demand groups, none of these people would have
considered themselves to be children of alcoholics or feminists but
responded to Doctrine Over Person pressure which allowed them to
please their authorities. It also allowed them to feel as though
they were a true and intimate participant with the group, allowing
them to merge their identity with the groups that apply great
pressure for them to do so. We are social creatures, and we need to
be a part of community. As Christians, we are required to have
fellowship with the Body of Christ and are warned against forsaking
it. (But... it shouldn't require us to re-write or redefine true
events of the past, something different than changing one's opinion
about how they feel about those past events.)
Pressure to exaggerate and to
reinterpret past history in this way to meet the desired template of
a group is another example of the working of Doctrine Over Person.
Hephzibah House,
the IFB boarding home for troubled girls, had their own desired
template and expectation for its resident prisoners. Any girl who
ended up in the facility could only be a whore and a hopelessly lost
criminal who somehow was not able to fully receive all of the
benefits of living as a new creation in Christ, even though the
Apostle Paul declares that this renewal is available to all who have
faith in Jesus and are fully reconciled unto God and made holy in
Him. Hephzibah girls were required to transform themselves
internally to accept their lesser and hopeless fate standard and to
prove Ron and Patti Williams true as a matter of their own survival
and to avoid additional punishments on to that which they already
suffered.
We've already considered how a
whole family was pressured through shame and fear to create and
believe false confessions about sexual abuse and murder, and in
addition, how a
prisoner of war began to believe things about his experiences
that never took place. In both these examples, the individuals
reduced their psychological stress by adopting a version of events
that was favored or encouraged by manipulators and interrogators, a
means of coping and survival.
In this next look at Doctrine Over
Person, consider Robert Lifton's description about why
these types of pressures have the power to affect memory, causing
people in distress to create or accept imagined events as true
elements of the past. The entire chapter concerning the eight
criteria of thought reform in Lifton's book appears
HERE online at the Apologetics Index, but I've pulled out some
specific quotes which explain Doctrine Over Person specifically and
why it takes place.
Excerpts from Chapter 22,
Ideological Totalism, in Lifton's Thought
Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, pp 431-2, (emphasis
mine):
For when the myth becomes fused with the totalist sacred science, the resulting “logic” can be so compelling and coercive that it simply replaces the realities of individual experience
[Host note: The sacred science refers to the doctrine, belief system, and both the written and unwritten rules of the group which the group and leaders never allow to come under any type of scrutiny.]
Consequently, past historical events are retrospectively altered, wholly rewritten, or ignored, to make them consistent with the doctrinal logic. This alteration becomes especially malignant when its distortions are imposed upon individual memory in the false confessions extracted during thought reform.. . .Rather than modify the myth in accordance with experience, the will to orthodoxy required instead that men be modified in order to reaffirm the myth.…The individual person who finds himself under such doctrine-dominated pressure to change is thrust into an intense struggle which takes place in relation to polarized feelings of sincerity and insincerity.
In a totalist environment, absolute “sincerity” is demanded; and the major criterion for that sincerity is likely to be one's degree of doctrinal compliance – both in regard to belief and to direction of personal change. Yet there is always the possibility of retaining an alternative version of sincerity (and of reality), the capacity to imagine a different kind of existence and another form of sincere commitment.
These alternative visions depend upon such things as the strength of previous identity, the penetration of the milieu by outside ideas, and the retained capacity for eventual individual renewal. . . The outcome will depend largely upon how much genuine relevance the doctrine has for the individual emotional predicament. And even for those to whom it seems totally appealing, the exuberant sense of well-being it temporarily affords may be more a “delusion of wholeness” than an expression of true and lasting inner harmony.
Take note that Lifton states that the
degree to which the adult subjects in the POW camps tended to
confabulate or create new memories depended upon that individual's
resiliency and personal character traits prior to their imprisonment.
He mentions their strength of identity, how willing they were to
accept ideas that were not their own, how capable they were of
resisting the new ideas, and their capacity to transcend the
suffering based upon optimism about life that they possessed before
they were subjected to the thought reform program in the camps.
Those who were emotionally strong and healthy prior to the experience
greatly influenced their personal outcome and response. He also
points out that redefining one's history often offers a “delusion
of wholeness” (a concept discussed
by Erik Erikson, an expert in childhood cognitive, psychosocial,
and ethical growth and development). Rather than a true expression
of peace that flows from inner harmony, it is instead a rough coping
mechanism and adaptation that allows the victim to survive their
trauma, giving them optimism to keep on living instead of falling
apart.
His ideas published here decades
earlier have been confirmed by current and cutting edge research
in PTSD today. Those with strong and supportive healthy
childhoods move quickly through PTSD recovery, while children with
developmental setbacks and childhood trauma face
greater difficulties with unrelated trauma in adulthood, and
traumatized children tend to live lives that are followed with many
retraumatizations.
Consider also that Lifton addresses
pressures placed upon adults. Now imagine how a child would respond
to such pressures – a child who is dependent upon the adults around
her for her survival but was betrayed by those adults who merely used
her for self-gratification.
A child of trauma lacks the ability to feel safe in the world and
confident in their own understanding of how life works. They learn
to adapt but lack the strength, ability, power, experience, and
sophistication that an adult possesses. Their adaptations are
primitive and often tend to be ineffective and pathologic once they
reach adulthood. How much more damaged by Doctrine Over Person
pressures would a young child be if even adults succumb and crumble
under such pressure? Fantasies of idealism, pretending that abusive
conditions are a heaven on earth (if only by comparison), could go a
long way for a child, giving them resiliency and a reason to keep on
living, despite overwhelmingly terrible conditions. Taking that
fantasy of idealism from a very damaged and fragile person who has
been deeply traumatized might send them into the depths of nihilistic
despair.
Could this not be the case with Lucinda
who goes to great lengths to sing the praises of Ron Williams, the
captor who she needs desperately to believe is a benevolent despot?
He demonstrated love for her by not raping her, and that might be
enough for her to believe that he was the best father figure she
could ever hope for and the best example of a parent she'd known up
until she was sent to Hephzibah House.
~~~~~~
The next post concerning Doctrine Over Person features material from Steven Martin's book, The Heresy of Mind Control: Recognizing Con Artists, Tyrants, and Spiritual Abusers in Leadership. Steven is a counselor at Wellspring, a Christian residential treatment program for those in recovery from religious abuse and controlling relationships..
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
and INFORMATION
About Hephzibah House
Please listen to all of the Jocelyn
Andersen's Blog Talk Radio episodes about Hephzibah House
- Hidden Abuses in the Baptist Church Part I: The 20/20 Episode (introduction to Hephzibah House)
- Hidden Abuses in the Baptist Church Part II: An interview with Susan Grotte (a 29 month resident in the early 1980s)
To learn more about Hephzibah House:
- Jeri Massi's Lambs of Hephzibah House podcasts
- Hephzibah Girls Blog (Susan Grotte's blogspot; This site includes copies of documents distributed to families by Ron Williams.)
- Former Hephzibah Girls (Visit their links page for more links on activism.)
-
-
- FACEBOOK